Page:
Source:
p. 11, b. 281-295
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 295
A comparison with analogous bar 311 suggests that the absence of the slur is rather an inaccuracy of notation in this case. This conclusion is confirmed by the inconsistent and most probably incomplete slurs in the L.H. in this bar. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest a two-bar slur modelled after bars 311-312. The slur was added also in EE3, yet without linking it to the next one, which may be considered an alternative attempt at reconstructing the notation of [A].
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo