Page:
Source:
p. 2, b. 45-92
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
The interpretation of the slurs of Atut by the engraver of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) may be considered justified, since the notation of the manuscript is most probably inaccurate. In the main text, we give a different interpretation of Atut, based on the assumption that the similarly looking beginnings of the slurs in bars 45 and 47 convey the same message – slurs from the beginning of the semiquaver tremolando (however, cf. the note in bar 45). This solution was adopted in GE3.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, GE revisions
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo