Page: 
Source: 
p. 10, b. 189-206
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-60
p. 3, b. 61-87
p. 4, b. 88-105
p. 5, b. 106-124
p. 6, b. 125-142
p. 7, b. 143-158
p. 8, b. 159-173
p. 9, b. 174-188
p. 10, b. 189-206
p. 11, b. 207-225
p. 12, b. 226-243
p. 13, b. 244-260
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 200-206

In bars 200-245, FE (→EE) has significantly fewer performance markings than in corresponding bars 88-133. In GE, the majority of them was most probably added by the reviser. Some of them are organically related to the sound image of the music ( in the L.H. in bar 204 and analog.) or its course (a tempo in bar 230), so adding them certainly is not contrary to the composer's intentions (it cannot be excluded that Chopin accepted them himself, while reviewing GE). Therefore, in the analogous places, we repeat both the markings added in GE (in brackets) and we add a few others (in square brackets).

Learn more »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, FES, FESf, GE1, EE1, EE2, EE3