




![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
The placement of the dynamic marking in FE (→EE1) – before the 2nd triplet in the bar – suggests a mistake. The Chopinesque proofreading entry could have been misinterpreted; it could have been
or even
if the original
was overlooked in the proof copy. In the first case, the composer's intention would be
, which we include as an additional possibility. According to us, a possible change of the correctly printed
to
is highly unlikely.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Verbal indications