Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slur of GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly inaccurate – it perfectly shows the disrespectful attitude of the engraver of GE1 to the Chopin slurring. The inaccuracy was partially corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The eight-note figure filling the 3rd quaver of the bar was written in A by Chopin as a demisemiquaver septuplet. The patent mistake was partially corrected in GE2, by writing it as an octuplet of demisemiquavers. According to us, there are no reasons for such an atypical notation, hence we replace the septuplet with a regular group of hemidemisemiquavers. In FE (→EE) the second note was overlooked, which removed the incompatibility of the notation with the actual state. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
On the 3rd beat of the bar GE1 contains up to three errors:
Only the first two were corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing small slurs next to both grace notes in this bar is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The overlooked staccato dot in the majority of the editions is most probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1. The sign in GE2 was added after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
