Verbal indications
|
b. 113-114
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The not too legible entry in FED is most probably a dynamic marking with a determined range of validity. According to us, it is probably cresc., yet dim. also seems to be possible. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 121
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 (→FE→EE) has a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The placement of leggiero in A is most probably conventional: the indication concerns generally the entire roulade and the choice of the right articulation and dynamics in combination with category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
We reproduce the poco ritenuto indication after A, in which Chopin suggested the range of the retardation (probably to the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The ten. indication over the d category imprint: Differences between sources |
indication under the chord in the L.H. It is most probably a misread 
sign, present in this place in 
is left to the discretion of the performer. 
2 minim). The editions used the standard notation.
