Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 124
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of the bar GC and FE lack in accidentals in the part of the R.H. The inaccuracy of Chopin's notation was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC and FE1 (→FE2→EE) lack in the accidental before the 3rd crotchet in the L.H. Patent in this context Chopin's mistake was corrected in GE and FE3 (→FE4). Moreover, FE1 overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct rhythmic notation of the middle notes of the chord, transmitted by GC (→GE). Among the remaining versions, the first is erroneous, whereas the second – inaccurate (probably due to a misunderstanding of the notation of [A]). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Different values of chord components , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 134-135
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of slurs in GE1 is undoubtedly an oversight of the engraver, rectified in GE2. The FE version also results most probably from the engraver's mistake. The slur omitted in FE was added in EE, perhaps at Chopin's request. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 137
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The inconsistent with the bar stucture L.H. slurring in GC as well as the lack of the second L.H. slur in FE1 are almost certainly mistakes by the copyist and the engraver. On the other hand, the slur added in FE2 (→EE,FE3→FE4) is probably inaccurate, as evidenced by the slurring of the subsequent bars. In the main text, we give the probable reconstruction of the slurs in [A], aptly guessed in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
before the 4th note.
