Page: 
Source: 
p. 8, b. 225-252
p. 1, b. 1-30
p. 2, b. 31-58
p. 3, b. 59-94
p. 4, b. 95-129
p. 5, b. 130-160
p. 6, b. 161-193
p. 7, b. 194-224
p. 8, b. 225-252
p. 9, b. 253-287
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 249-253

Slur in bars 250-251 in GC (→GE)

Slur in bars 249-253 in FE (→EE)

In the main text we give the slur of FE (→EE), most probably faithfully reproducing the notation of [A]. The slur of GC (→GE) is undoubtedly inaccurate, same as in bars 61-65 – the recapitulation in the copy is marked in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the first section of Scherzo.

See b. 61-65

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GC, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FESch, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2