![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 162-172
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 33-44 (in the autographs the discussed bars are not written out), we reproduce the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 167-168
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 173
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 45-48, in the main text we give the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 189-192
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the sign in GE most probably means that it was originally absent also in FE, in which it was however added – perhaps by Chopin – in the last stage of proofreadings of FE. In the main text we give the sign written in A in these bars, slightly longer than in the previous appearances of this phrase. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |