Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 14-28
p. 1, b. 1-13
p. 2, b. 14-28
p. 3, b. 29-53
p. 4, b. 54-78
p. 5, b. 79-103
p. 6, b. 104-119
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 25

Broken slur in GC (literal reading→GE1) & FE

Continuous slur in GC (possible interpretation), EE & GE2 (→GE3)

The slur in bar 25 in GC is broken, yet the way in which the slur in bar 26 starts suggests, according to us, continuation of the slur, as it is in EE (and later GE). It is hard to state what was Chopin's intention in this place, yet this kind of differences has a minimal influence on the performance.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GC, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3