Issues : Errors of GC
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of the naturals raising C-c to C-c is almost certainly Chopin's mistake, despite the fact that this kind of oversights of signs introducing alterations are not frequent (yet they are to be found in, e.g., the Etude in F minor, No. 2, bar 56). It could have seemed that the C-c octave did not require naturals due to the following reasons:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Last key signature sign , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the complementary fingering of GC (→GE1) and FE and EE, although it is possible that it was only the latter that was given by Chopin, as the copyist, having in front of him these four numerals, could have mistaken the figures and, after having correctly written the first two ones, could have added the last three four semiquavers further. In GE2, the third numeral was added in bar 45, whereas in GE3, the alleged return to the version of GE1 can be a result of the blurry imprint of this numeral. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |