Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-69
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-32
p. 3, b. 33-50
p. 4, b. 51-69
Main text
Main text
AT - Autograph of a fragment
AW - Presentation Autograph
CDP - Copy for Delfina Potocka
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AT - Autograph of a fragment
AW - Presentation Autograph
CDP - Copy for Delfina Potocka
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 57

Double slurs in AW

Continuous slur in CDP & EE

Slurs in GC (→GE1)

Slurs in GE2 (→GE3)

Slurs in FE

There is no doubt about the moment of breaking the slur in the 2nd half of bar 57, despite differences in the sources. The compatible versions of AW and FE are additionally confirmed by the slurring of AW in bars 7 and 26 and, what is important, by the separation sign added by Chopin in FED between the 8th and 9th quavers in the bar. The slurring of GC (→GE1) is certainly erroneous (inaccurate, sometimes even incongruous slurs are characteristic for Gutmann as copyist). The version of GE2 (→GE3) is a non-authentic attempt to agree the slurs and staccato (portato) dots. It is much more difficult to explain the origin of compatible version of CDP and EE, perhaps it is the original notation of [A], while the separation of slurs in the 2nd half of the bar took place between preparing the copy, being base text to EE, and handing the autograph to Gutmann, whose result was GC.

The issue of number of the portato dots – see the adjacent note. 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, Inaccuracies in GC

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: AT, AW, CDP, GC, FE1, FES, FED, FEJ, FE2, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE1b