Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Ornaments
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Ornaments

b. 3

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No sign in AI & FE (→EE2EE3)

Arpeggio sign in GE & EE4

..

Lack of the arpeggio mark in FE (→EE2EE3) may be explained with the correction of the part of the L.H., performed by Chopin in FE1 (see the adjacent note). Chopin, involved in changes in the structure and content of the chords, probably did not think of careful indication of their performance, considering arpeggios of such a broad chord to be obvious. Similarly in bars 11, 53 and 61. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 3

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No sign in AI

Arpeggio sign in FE (→GE,EE)

..

The arpeggio mark before the first tenth chord of the Etude is, according to us, to be understood as a general indication, concerning all analogous situations (bars 11, 53 and 61). See also the next note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 11

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No signs in AI & FE (→GE1,EE2)

Three arpeggio signs in GE1a (→GE2GE3GE4GE5) & EE4

Arpeggio sign in EE3

..

According to us, arpeggio performance of the tenth chords stands beyond any doubt – it is proved by Chopin sign in bar 3, left almost certainly as a general indication concerning all analogous situations.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions