Issues : Authentic corrections of FE

b. 28-29

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

in A

No indications in FE (→GE,EE)

Our variant suggestion

..

According to us, the agogic indications written in A were overlooked in FE (→GE,EE). However, Chopin's proofreading cannot be entirely excluded, much less the acceptance of the lack of these indications. Therefore, in the main text we give them in brackets, leaving their use to the performer's taste.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 29-31

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

..

In FE (→GE,EE) these bars are written with four sharp key signatures, as a result of which in each bar notes must be provided with accidental naturals. It is probably an error of the engraver, perhaps relying on the previous section in E major (bars 17-22). Similarly in bars 32-34. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 29-31

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

No pedalling in A

Pedalling in FE (→GE,EE)

..

The pedalling originates from Chopin's proofreading of FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 32-34

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

..

In FE (→GE,EE) these bars – same as bars 29-31 – are written with four sharp key signatures, as a result of which in each bar notes must be provided with accidental naturals. In FE the  before d3 in bar 32 was omitted.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 32

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

No pedalling in A

Pedalling in FE (→GE,EE)

..

This bar ends the next section in which Chopin added the pedalling while proofreading FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE