Verbal indications
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The indication poco rall. was added by Chopin most probably in the last proofreading of FE (→EE). It is indicated by its absence in GE1 (→GE1a→GE2). The subsequent GE add in this place only rall., probably to justify a tempo in bar 62. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The indication was added by Chopin in FED, in which there are no dynamic indications both in this () and in the next bar (). Therefore, it is possible that the addition was meant to change the dynamic concept of the return of the main theme of the Etude, written in A and given in the main text. However, it is not the only possibility – the indication may also be considered as clarification of the local dynamic level of the 2nd half of bar 61, not determining the way of performance of bar 62 and subsequent ones. Due to this fact, we suggest a possibility of including independently from the remaining indications. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
According to us, the fact of leaving out and legatiss. is a result of inattention of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). The entry in a pupils' copy in bar 61 may however suggest that in the later period, Chopin not only accepted the absence of these indications, but even slightly modified the original dynamic concept of the return of the main theme. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The editions overlook the 'e' conjunction between stretto and cresc. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |