mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 25

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

Long accent in A

 in FE (→GE1,EE)

 in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5)
..

It is the longest out of three evident long accents written in A in bars 21, 25 and 27. In FE (→GE1,EE) it was reproduced as three-semiquaver-long  hairpins. In subsequent GE, the sign was extended in order to cover the entire length of the semiquaver beam (such kind of adjustments of slurs and hairpins to regular rhythmic groups was a characteristic manner of German engravers, both Kistner and Breitkopf and Härtel). Cf. bar 27.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 27

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No marks in AI, A (→FE→EE) & GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5)

Staccato dots in GE1 (→GE1a)
..

The staccato dots in GE1 (→GE1a) are certainly a mistake, corrected in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 27

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

Long accent in A (→FE→EE2→EE3)

 in GE1 (→GE1a)

 in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) & EE4
..

The long accent in A (→FE→EE2→EE3) was reproduced in GE1 (→GE1a) as  hairpins after bar 25. The homogeneity was maintained in subsequent GE, extending the sign even more, for four semiquavers. This arbitrary version was repeated also in EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 27

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No sign in AI & A

 in FE (→GE,EE)

 as our alternative suggestion
..

Looking at bar 29, one could wonder whether the  hairpins added in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE) were not mistakenly reversed, which was frequent in Chopin's works (cf. e.g. the Etude in C minor, No. 12, bar 53). 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Sign reversal

b. 28

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

..

There is no staccato dot over the 4th semiquaver in A. It is such an evident oversight that its presence in FE (→GE,EE) may be even a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. However, a conscious action of the engraver or Chopin's proofreading also cannot be excluded.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A