Verbal indications
b. 34-35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
It seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin, at the time of adding in a proofreading of FE (→GE), wanted to indicate the scope of validity of the forte dynamics from the place it was put by the engraver. According to us, there are two possible explanations:
In the main text we suggest a solution stemming from the first possibility, as being closer to the source notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Centrally placed marks |
|||||
b. 36-44
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The following indications: dim. in bars 36 and 40 as well as cresc. in bar 44 were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In GE the abbreviation dim. was extended to dimin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The direction was added by Chopin while proofreading FE (→EE). The lack of the indication in GE possibly means that it was among the latest Chopin's corrections of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 49-54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
All dynamic indications in bars 49-51 and 53-54 were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |