mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-68
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-33
p. 3, b. 34-50
p. 4, b. 51-68
p. 5, b. 69-84
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 62

 in A

No sign in FE (→GE,EE) 

We consider the lack of  hairpins in FE (→GE,EE) as a result of the engraver's negligence, which is indicated by the omission of a few other marks in this bar (ties, slurs, , wedge). Intentional renouncement of the indications in this place seems to be highly unlikely from the musical point of view.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4
Complete ➔