|
|
Possible long accents in A |
|
|
Possible short accents in A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short accents suggested by the editors |
|
|
Long accents suggested by the editors |
In the majority of the sources, the notation of accents is inaccurate. In A in bars 43-44 Chopin limited himself to general suggestions concerning accents, in FE (→GE,EE) the marks were partially completed (only in bar 43). Moreover, the attention is drawn by the difference in bars 41-42 – in FE (→GE) the accent on the 2nd beat in bar 41 was omitted (added in EE3), yet a mark was added over the last group in bar 42. All cases of the mark's omissions most probably result from distraction. In the main text we include all accents in bars 41-43 and we suggest to complete the marks in bar 44. EE4 displays such completed text.
The type of accents, which Chopin had in mind at the time of writing A in these bars, constitutes another problem. We consider short accents to be more natural in this context and this is how it was understood in FE (→GE,EE). However, due to the existing doubts, we also suggest long accents as a possible interpretation of A and an alternative version of the main text.
See b. 1-6
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Pitch