![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Centrally placed marks
b. 2-4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The performance markings of A quite significantly differ from the ones included in FE (→GE,EE). Due to the fact that next to the omission of verbal indications in A the accents in the R.H. in bars 2 and 4 were added, we consider the printed version as proofread by Chopin and we adopt it in the main text. The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Not being certain whether the lack of sempre legato in FE (→GE,EE) is accidental, we give the indication in brackets. In bars 45-46 the analogous passage is embraced with slurs in all sources, which indirectly confirms the legato articulation also in this case. In spite of the fact that the indication in A begins only in the 2nd group of semiquavers, its binding force from the beginning of the passage is undeniable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||
b. 51-63
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A the dynamic marks – category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
It is uncertain why category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Centrally placed marks |