Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 29-38
p. 1, b. 1-8
p. 2, b. 9-18
p. 3, b. 19-28
p. 4, b. 29-38
p. 5, b. 39-49
Main text
Main text
CLI - Copy by Linowski
Ap - Presentation autograph
FE - French edition
FEcor - Chopin's FE proof
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - Second impression of [EE1]
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
CLI - Copy by Linowski
Ap - Presentation autograph
FE - French edition
FEcor - Chopin's FE proof
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - Second impression of [EE1]
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 37

Octave in CLI

Single note in Ap

Single note in FE (→GE,EE

Octave possibly intended in FE

In the main text we give the version of Ap and FE (→GE,EE), which could have been intended by Chopin, as he did not add A1 during numerous proofreadings of FE. In this version, the appearance of octaves in the bass is very consistent in the reprise: single notes in bars 36-40 and octaves from bar 41 to the end. However, it is very likely that the engraver of FE accidentally omitted the lower note of the octave, while Chopin did not notice it in proofings (the fact that the base text for FE could have included the octave is proved by CLI). There is no doubt that the octave, same as the remaining quavers in the L.H., would have been provided with a staccato dot.

Learn more »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: GE1