Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 55-74
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-38
p. 3, b. 39-54
p. 4, b. 55-74
p. 5, b. 75-91
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 63-66

in FE1 (→EE)

in FE2

in GE

Our suggestion

In the main text we adopt the more precise indication of FE1 (→EE). The partially lacking dashes indicating the scope of crescendo in FE2 is certainly a result of the engraver's negligence. It is possible that their total absence in GE is also an error (cf. the remark concerning bars 55-58). According to us, both the earlier placement of crescendo in GE and the placement of the indication above the upper stave in FE (→EE) may have resulted from the lack of space between the staves.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Verbal indications