Issues : EE revisions

b. 66

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

Less likely reading of the slur in FE1

More likely reading of the slur in FE1

Slur in FE2 & EE1

Slurs in GE & EE2

..

According to us, the end of the slur in FE1 is printed inaccurately; the slur in bar 67, which is in the next line, suggests to continue the slur from the previous bar. However, both in FE2 and EE it was the scope of the slur in bar 66 that was assumed as the correct one. Moreover, in those editions the whole sign was moved under the notes, which is almost certainly contrary to the notation of [A1]. The slurs of GE present probably a slightly different version of this place in [A2]. The version of EE2 is a compilation of the notation of EE1 and GE.
In the main text we give the most probable interpretation of the slur of FE1; we consider that version the closest to the authentic notation among all source versions.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , FE revisions

b. 67

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

..

The slurs in the R.H. have three version in the sources, out of which only one – the continuation of the slur from bar 66 – is authentic, according to us. Due to the need to coordinate the versions of the slurs with the versions of the rhythm in the 1st half of the bar, the slurring variants are considered in the remark concerning rhythm.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , FE revisions

b. 67

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

 in FE (→EE1)

Two 's in EE2

Our suggestion

..

Considering the indication crescendo in bars 63-66, various placement of the  mark in FE and GE must be considered as relevant. Not being sure whether the place of the sign in GE really follows the notation of the autograph, in the main text we move  between the stave (it does not change its operating area). In EE2 the indications of FE (→EE1) and GE were compilated.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 70-74

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

Rhythmic notation in FE

Our suggestion

..

In the main text we make the notation of the 2nd half of bar 70 and 74 more precise, following the undoubtedly correct and precise notation of FE1 in bar 8 and GE in bar 22.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 73

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

..

The omitted  before the last quaver in FE1 was added in FE2 and EE. The correct text is also in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions