Issues : EE revisions
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In EE the indication con anima appears only in bar 61. This is certainly the result of planning out the musical text in such a way that bar 61 is the first bar on a new page. For the same reason, this solution may also be recommended for texts created in our system. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2) the accent was omitted and later reintroduced, in the form of a long accent, in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 74-76
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The hairpins in A may be read and interpreted in a number of ways. This is so because the beginning of the mark was drawn too vigorously and its ends are of unequal length. The versions of GE1 (→FE) and GE2 (→GE#) present two attempts to decipher the notation of A. The hairpins in EE are probably a distorted accent. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Unclear hairpins in A |
|||||||||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In GE1 (→FE, GE2), a was printed before G flat in the L.H. This is an error, probably resulting from the mistaken reading of the letter 'p' from . In EE this erroneous marking was placed above the note and in GE3 – removed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In EE, the term ritenuto was replaced with the abbreviated riten. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |