Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 3-19

One of the intriguing features of FCs is the almost complete absence of augmentation dots in  groups. The dots are present only in bar 3 next to d2, in the 2nd half of bar 9 (all necessary ones), in bar 17 next to the e1-g1-b1-e2 chord and in bar 22 next to a1, which means that 56 dots were omitted. It could be a feature of Chopin's sketch autograph reproduced by Fontana or facilitation applied by the copyist, who, perhaps, was copying it under time pressure. We prefer the former – if Fontana had been omitting dots due to time pressure, he could have added them later. On the other hand, since he was copying Chopin's incomplete and, consequently, ambiguous notation, he could be afraid that he might guess it incorrectly.
In the edited FCs version we provide, we add all these dots after the final version.

If the Chopinesque sketch was actually devoid of dots, one could assume that Chopin first wrote bare quavers in these places and then added semiquaver beams "en bloc", omitting the majority of dots due to their obvious nature in this situation.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues:

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2