mUltimate Chopin

WN 29, Waltz in E minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in PE

b. 124

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

No marking in PE1 (→GE)

 in PE2 (→PE3→PE4)

 suggested by the editors
..

The  indication was added in PE2 (→PE3→PE4) probably as a correction of the oversight by the engraver of PE1 (→GE). According to us, however, it is more likely that the indication entered into [A] was , and not :

  • Chopin would use  only in exceptional cases,
  • publishers had problems with deciphering  as a less popular form of this indication (on a number of occasions, it was replaced with , while in the Variations in B, Op. 12 an uncommon zf abbreviation was used a few times).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in PE ,

b. 124

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

No marks in PE1 (→GE)

Wedges in PE2 (→PE3→PE4)
..

The wedges for the 1st crotchet were most probably overlooked by PE1 (→GE), which was rectified by adding them in PE2 (→PE3→PE4). Cf. the note on / below.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Wedges , Errors in PE ,

b. 124

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

in PE

No markings in GE

[]  suggested by the editors
..

The version of GE and our main text are two alternative ways of correcting the wrong version of PE, in which it is only a  mark that is present in this bar, without the corresponding  mark.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE

b. 125

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

..

In PE1 (→PE2) there is no  lowering f2 to f2. The patent mistake was corrected in GE. A natural to this note was also added in PE3 (→PE4); however, it was placed on the wrong side of the note – right.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Sign reversal , Errors in PE ,