|
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
It is difficult to say how the difference in slurring occurred. Both versions seem musically equal. In the main text we give the version of the principal source, FC. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The cautionary flat to E category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Alterations in CF |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 79-94
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
We give the staccato dots for the bass notes after FE, which is more accurate in this respect than FC (we add the only dot omitted by FE in bar 93 after FC). In GE1 and EE the versions of FC and FE, respectively, were inaccurately reproduced. All dots were added only in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 85-86
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
We consider the missing accents, which are present in analogous bars 15-16, to be Chopin's inadvertence, since nothing indicates that – in spite of minor differences – the composer could have envisioned a different performance of bars 9-24 and 79-94. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we omit the Chopinesque but unjustified cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
is present in 
; however, in 
