![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Hairpins denoting continuation
b. 4-6
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In bar 6, opening a new line of the text in A (→FE→GE), Chopin wrote new category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the most likely explanation for the existing discrepancy between the sources based on [A] is the sometimes used by the engravers identification of two (or more) following
Due to this fact, in the main text we give the source and stylistically unquestionable indications of GC (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The separated category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest a variant solution that takes into account both the version of GE and that of FE (→EE). The two category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
A has only a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Hairpins denoting continuation |