![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FC
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
According to us, placing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 1-5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
The differences between the sources result from mistakes and inaccuracies of both the copyist and the engravers of FE and GE. However, the issues concerning the decipherment and the interpretation of A were caused by, e.g. a dense notation, without spaces between the staves – actually, in A there is no space for pedalling markings, added later, which resulted in them being placed inaccurately at times. The interpretation of A given in the main text corrects the position of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 1-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The The markings in the remaining sources also indicate that attempts were made to unify them, although in the case of FC (→GE), the first two passages are provided with clearly longer marks than the subsequent ones. Those versions can be considered an acceptable interpretation of the notation of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Actually, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the slur of FE (→EE), since the vast majority of subsequent slurs, present in a similar context, is led to the 1st quaver in the next bar in A – out of 13 slurs in b. 1-12 and 15, it is only the slurs in b. 1, 8 and 10 that end on the 6th quaver; two (in b. 6 and 9) are ambiguous. We consider all the above slurs to be inaccurate, since the differences in the range of slurs are not related to the structure of motifs, e.g. the shorter slurs in b. 1 and 8 are opposed by the longer ones in similar figures in b. 2 and 7. Moreover, in A one can see corrections – the slurs in b. 4-5 and 5-6 were being extended (in b. 3-4 probably too). Along with the crossed-out staccato dot at the beginning of b. 2, it may indicate that the concept of markings of those figures changed from category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Corrections in A , FE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Inaccuracies in FC |