Issues : Annotations in FEFr
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
Franchomme described the variant of the Nocturne opening recorded in FEFr as „the change made by the author”. We correct the obviously erroneous a flat on the last semiquaver of each group to f. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in FEFr , Authentic post-publication changes and variants |
|||||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The edited text is the indisputable version of A (→GE); also EE3 and FEFr have the correct text. The version of FE (→EE1) is most probably erroneous – cf. analogous bar 55. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEFr |
|||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The variant written by Franchomme into FEFr displays all the elements of Chopin's style. It is not unlikely that a zigzag visible in FED between the grace note b double flat1 and the following f flat2 means a similar ornamental phrase. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in FEFr , Authentic post-publication changes and variants |
|||||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The authenticity of the dynamic marking given by Franchomme does not give rise to any major doubt, and we take it into consideration as one of the possible interpretations of that fragment. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in FEFr |
|||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The return of the first theme of the Nocturne in bar 26 was initially – in A (→GE→FE→EE) – preceded with a . mark. Chopin deleted it in FEJ and FES, and in FEFr Franchomme removed and written in . category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEFr , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEJ |