Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In the main text we suggest to complete the pedalling after a possible Chopin proofreading of FE in analogous bar 12. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
Similarly as in bar 24, one group of sources (EE) has a pedal change here, omitted in other sources. Most probably, it is the original version, overlooked by Chopin at the time of introducing corrections. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In analogous bar 7, in the proofreading of FE1 Chopin added a crotchet stem for g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
|
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
Each of the source versions could have been intended by Chopin, yet only the authenticity of the version with mordent is unquestionable. On the other hand, the notation with the use of grace notes, present certainly in analogous bar 52, is clearly later. Taking the above into account, in the main text we suggest an ornament in the form of grace notes. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections of EE |
in the L.H. The absence of a similar correction in bar 32 is to be considered to be Chopin's oversight. The crotchet in 
in 
in