Issues : Inaccurate slurs in A

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 203

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

Slur from d to b in A, literal reading

Four-quaver slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

In A the L.H. slur in the 1st half of the bar encompasses only the 2nd and 3rd quaver. It is almost certainly one of the more glaring examples of the inaccurate notation in this autograph (in this respect), hence to the main text we adopt the editions' interpretation of this slur.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 204-205

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

Slurs separated in b. 204 in A (→GE)

Slurs chained in b. 205 in FE (→EE)

Slurs separated in b. 205, our alternative suggestion

..

As in bars 199-203, the FE slurs may be an authentic variant of phrasing, yet most probably written down inaccurately. We assume that the beginning of the slur in bar 205 is probably erroneous (from the 1st chord, suggesting that the phrase should be divided internally, resulting in the dominant chord leading to the tonic chord being separated from it). Therefore, as an alternative for the source notation, we suggest moving the beginning of this slur over the next chord. In the main text we give here the A slurs (→GE), unquestionable in this place, despite the beginning of the slur starting in bar 204 being over the g1 semiquaver (most probably due to ink stoppage).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 205-207

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur in A (contextual interpretation) & GE2

No slur in GE1 (→FEEE1)

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)

..

In bars 205-206, ending the page in A, the slur is led only over the R.H. However, on a new page, in bar 207 the ending of the slur is written in the parts of both hands. It can be simply an insignificant mistake, yet, according to us, writing the slur also in the L.H. proves that Chopin was convinced that he wrote slurs for both hands in the previous bars. Perhaps the slur in GE2 was added on that basis – it is absent in GE1 (→FEEE1). A slur added only in bar 206 in EE2 (→EE3) is absolutely arbitrary. See also bars 212-213.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 205

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Slur in A (→FEEE,GE1GE1a,GE2GE3)

No slur in GE4

..

In A (→FEGE), the slur running from the a2 crotchet is not continued in the next bar (in a new line). The inaccuracy was removed by EE, in which the ending of the slur was added in b. 206; GE4 also removed the beginning of that slur.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 206

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Slur in A (→FEGE1GE1a,GE2GE3), contextual interpretation & in EE

No slur in GE4

..

In A, the slur that began in the previous bar (at the end of a line) was not continued here. This inaccuracy, so frequent in Chopin's works, was repeated by FE (→GE). We reproduce this incomplete, clearly erroneous version only in the graphic transcription, except for GE4, in which it was also the beginning of this slur in b. 205 that was removed. The ending of the slur was added only by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE